Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7375| Title: | Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) – The case for Recognition of Prior Learning sites and knowledges in South Africa’s transforming education system | Authors: | Alexander, Gregory Van Wyk, Michael M. Bereng, T. November, Ivan |
Keywords: | Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP);Communities of practice;Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL);Afrocentric paradigm;Narrative | Issue Date: | 2010 | Publisher: | Elsevier | Source: | Alexander, G., Van Wyk, M. M., Bereng, T. et al. 2010. Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) – The case for Recognition of Prior Learning sites and knowledges in South Africa’s transforming education system. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1): 45-52. [http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.012] | Journal: | Teaching and Teacher Education | Abstract: | By definition and purpose, education is the development of human capital towards meeting the indi- vidual and social needs of learners and their societies. This transdisciplinary collaboration parallels the underpinning principle of Lave and Wenger’s Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Lave & Wenger, 1990) to South Africa’s post-colonial legitimation of alternative sites and enskilment canons. Central to both is legitimation of knowledge acquisition from communities of practice or sites and ‘knowers’ (Mphahlele, 1992) ‘outside formal institutions’ of teaching/learning. Considered and termed ‘informal’ and by deduction, less legitimate for meritorious enskilment, the South African Qualifications Authority (1995, 2002) decrees a transformative paradigm and method of validating these sites and their skills produc- tion. SAQA highlights the fact that the pedagogical approach of such sites is context- and learner-centred with demonstrable socially valuable skills. This post-colonial mandate thus centres the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) as an acknowledgement of multiple foci of skills production, decreeing their overdue certification, as in our case study of the Van Wyk situation. The approach confronts and deconstructs the colonial marginalisation of human capital from outside ‘formal’/official institutions. It is part of the ideological framework of redressing the race and class exclusion mechanisms of artisans and others from the landscape of skills possession. It subscribes therefore to the canon of different ‘ways of knowing’ (Mosala, 1998). Van Wyk’s narrative exemplify the merits of ‘outside-institutions’ learning and enskil- ment to various levels of complexity. The objective of such legitimation is that certification provides credibility and legitimacy, thereby widening the marketability of apprentices’ skills. The social recog- nition and accorded certification thereof carries uncontested confirmation of expertise. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7375 | ISSN: | 0742-051X | DOI: | http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.012 |
| Appears in Collections: | Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised) |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legitimate Peripheral Participation (LPP) – The case for Recognition.pdf | 205.06 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
90
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Dec 29, 2025
Download(s)
69
checked on Dec 29, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.