Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/9647
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDlangamandla, Cynthiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNtwampe, Seteno Karabo Obeden_US
dc.contributor.authorBasitere, Mosesen_US
dc.contributor.authorChidi, Boredi Silasen_US
dc.contributor.authorOkeleye, Benjamin Ifeoluwaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T13:24:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-16T13:24:36Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationDlangamandla, C. et al. 2023. Biodefoamer-supported activated sludge system for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Applied Sciences-Basel, 13:1-13. [https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169225]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/9647-
dc.description.abstractPoultry slaughterhouse wastewater (PSW) is laden with fats, oil, and grease (FOG), as well as proteins. As such, PSW promotes the proliferation of filamentous organisms, which cause foam formation. In this study, the production of biological defoamers (biodefoamers) uses a consortium with antagonistic properties, i.e., 1.39 L of wastewater/mL defoamers, as reported in our previous study, toward foam formers and their application in the treatment of PSW using a bench-scale activated sludge (AS)-supported treatment system consisting of an aeration and clarification tank. The foam produced was slimy, brown, and thick, suggesting the presence of Nocardia, Microthrix, and Type 1863 species in the PSW/AS wastewater treatment system. The bio (Bio-AS) and syntheticdefoamers (Syn-AS, positive control) supplementation, i.e., at 4% v/v in the PSW/AS primary treatment stage (aeration tank) operated over ten days, resulted in 94% and 98% FOG and protein removal for the biodefoamers, respectively, when compared to 50% and 92% for a synthetic defoamer, respectively. Similarly, the Bio-AS treatment achieved 85.4% COD removal, while a lowly 51% was observed for the Syn-AS PSW treatment regime. Overall, the biodefoamers performed vehemently compared to synthetic defoamers, improving the PSW/AS system’s performance. It was prudent to hypothesize that the biodefoamers might have had FOG solubilization attributes, an assertion that needs further research in future studies. It was concluded that Bio-AS was more efficient in the removal of FOG, proteins, TSS, and COD in comparison to Syn-AS and negative control without supplementation (CAS).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences-Baselen_US
dc.subjectActivated sludgeen_US
dc.subjectprotein removalen_US
dc.subjectpoultry slaughterhouse wastewateren_US
dc.subjectNocardia sppen_US
dc.subjectfats–oil–grease removalen_US
dc.subjectdefoamersen_US
dc.subjectchemical oxygen demanden_US
dc.titleBiodefoamer-supported activated sludge system for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewateren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13169225-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Biodefoamer_Supported_Activated_Sludge_System.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

189
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Aug 15, 2026

Download(s)

59
checked on Aug 15, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.