Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/9824
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWaghid, Zayden_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T08:09:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T08:09:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationWaghid, Z. 2023. Teacher educators’ pedagogical practices in global citizenship education using the soft vs critical GCE framework. Cogent Education, 10(2):1-19. [https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2251757]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2331-186X (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/9824-
dc.description.abstractIn a critical review of the South African government’s Minimum Requirements for Teacher Education Qualifications (MRTEQ), designed to provide a foundation for teacher education institutions, a stark deficiency emerges in terms of critical Global Citizenship Education (GCE). This paper thus aims to investigate the underpinnings guiding teacher educators’ pedagogical practices in developing the capacities their students require for a critical GCE. A case study research design guided by an interpretative paradigm was used. Semi-structured online interviews were conducted among nine teacher educators at a university in South Africa. The adoption of a case study design with a small sample size restricts the generalisability of the findings. The researcher acknowledges this limitation; however, this study was of an explanatory nature, with the objective of gaining in-depth knowledge of the teacher educators’ reactions to the interview questions, rather than aiming to generalise the findings. The study establishes a compelling link between teacher educators’ familiarity/understanding with GCE, curriculum integration, and the use of technology in the development of globally-minded, critically-thinking citizens. The findings suggest that the majority of university educators favoured soft GCE approaches, whereas a sizable minority embraced crucial GCE qualities. The findings further confirm that when technology is used in the classroom, it helps students work together and think critically, which leads to a significant rise in student autonomy. However, the research reveals significant barriers, such as a lack of technology, a predominant focus on content over meaningful dialogue, and the implications of using either a soft or critical GCE approach. These results underscore the need for addressing these challenges to effectively facilitate respectful discussions and cultivate critical global citizenship in students.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofCogent Educationen_US
dc.subjectGlobal citizenship educationen_US
dc.subjectSocial justiceen_US
dc.subjectEducational technologyen_US
dc.subjectPedagogyen_US
dc.subjectTeacher educatorsen_US
dc.subjectSouth African educationen_US
dc.subjectGlobal Southen_US
dc.titleTeacher educators’ pedagogical practices in global citizenship education using the soft vs critical GCE frameworken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/2331186X.2023.2251757-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Teacher_educators_pedagogical_practices.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

169
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on Aug 15, 2026

Download(s)

70
checked on Aug 15, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.