Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/9765
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkenwa-Vincent, Emmanuel E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Jyotien_US
dc.contributor.authorClarke-Farr, Peter Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-23T09:45:04Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-23T09:45:04Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationOkenwa-Vincent, E.E., Naidoo, J & Clarke-Farr, P.C. 2023. Utility for uncorrected refractive errors in adolescent schoolchildren in Kakamega County, KenyaOptometry and Vision Science, 100(9):631-637. [10.1097/OPX.0000000000002054]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1040-5488-
dc.identifier.issn1538-9235 (online)-
dc.identifier.uri10.1097/OPX.0000000000002054-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/9765-
dc.description.abstractSignificance: Uncorrected refractive errors (UREs) present an enormous lifetime burden in children. Despite this, there is a dearth of knowledge on URE-related preference-based quality of life (QoL) in East Africa. This study demonstrates the positive impact of interventions on UREs; hence, it provides an empirical justification for advocacy to improve the QoL of children with URE. Purpose: This study investigated the preference-based QoL (utility) for URE in school-going adolescents of Kakamega County, in Kenya. Methods: An observational cross-sectional study with multistage sampling was conducted on randomly selected secondary school adolescents. School-going adolescents in Forms 1 to 4 were clinically examined for the presence of URE and classified according to their URE types. Pre-screened students who met the selection criteria were classified into two groups: URE and normal sight. Participants in the normal-sight group were randomly selected from among screened students without URE. Selected participants were administered a previously validated adolescent-specific utility weighting instrument-Assessment of Quality of Life-Six Dimensions. Results: A total of 330 participants aged 17.32 ± 1.60 years (URE, 17.50 ± 1.58 years; normal-sight, 17.15 ± 1.61 years) were included in the study. The mean utility score, as elicited by the Assessment of Quality of Life-Six Dimensions scoring algorithm, was better in the normal-sight group (URE, 0.496 ± 0.22; normal sight, 0.567 ± 0.25) at baseline, whereas the reverse was true at follow-up (URE, 0.655 ± 0.20; normal sight, 0.603 ± 0.25). In all cases, the differences were significant ( P < .05); however, there was no significantly better ( P > .05) utility elicited by any URE subtype at any given time point. Nonetheless, the URE group showed significantly better utility ( P < .05) after spectacle correction. Conclusions: Uncorrected refractive errors are associated with reduced utility in school-going adolescents, regardless of URE subtype. Spectacle correction resulted in a significantly improved utility for those with URE. Thus, this study recommends early public health strategies and spectacle interventions in schools for adolescents with URE.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOptometry and Vision Scienceen_US
dc.titleUtility for uncorrected refractive errors in adolescent schoolchildren in Kakamega County, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

151
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.