Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/9417
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSigadla, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAvenant, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFanadzo, Morrisen_US
dc.contributor.authorKangueehi, G.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAvenant, J.H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-06T10:06:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-06T10:06:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSigadla, A., Avenant, E., Fanadzo, M. et al. 2022. Water footprint of table grape production systems: a review of South African and global studies. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 43(2): 125-132. [https://doi.org/10.21548/43-2-5120]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2224-7904-
dc.identifier.issn0253-939X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/9417-
dc.description.abstractBeing a water-scarce country, South Africa (SA) faces several water challenges, including drought and other effects of climate change. Therefore, there is a need to improve water-use efficiency (WUE) by accurately quantifying the water use and WUE of table grape vineyards. The objective of this review is to (i) provide an overview of water footprint (WF) studies conducted on table grape production systems in SA and globally; (ii) identify limitations in current WF assessments of table grape production systems; and (iii) establish a range of WF values for table grape production systems as an indicator of WUE and for use in decision-making regarding sustainable freshwater use. The review has demonstrated that only a limited number of detailed WF studies have been undertaken on table grapes in SA and globally. Region-specific lookup tables for quantifying blue, green and grey water use in table grape production systems are available for three table grape production regions of SA and could be used for future WF assessments. Most global studies conducted on grape WF and WUE were desktop studies and did not include actual field records from production units, nor did they distinguish between different grape types (table, raisin and wine grapes). WF values must be interpreted in context, specifically regarding the water used versus yield, quality and income, as well as the region, climatic conditions, soil characteristics, irrigation and cultivation practices. For future WF and WUE assessments, a more detailed breakdown of water use is recommended, both during the production process and postharvest.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Society for Enology and Viticultureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African Journal of Enology and Viticultureen_US
dc.subjectWater footprinten_US
dc.subjectTable grapesen_US
dc.subjectWater-use efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectIrrigation requirementsen_US
dc.titleWater footprint of table grape production systems: a review of South African and global studiesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21548/43-2-5120-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Water_footprint_of_table_grape_production.pdfArticle410.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

143
Last Week
0
Last month
11
checked on Oct 18, 2026

Download(s)

152
checked on Oct 18, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.