Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8782
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Tainã G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Koebraaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Tamara B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-31T13:18:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-31T13:18:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationLoureiro, T.G., Peters, K. & Robinson, T.B. 2021. Light, shade and predation: who wins and who loses in sessile fouling communities?. Marine Biodiversity (2021) 51: 94 Vol.:(0112 33456789) [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-021-01241-5]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1867-1624-
dc.identifier.issn1867-1616-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8782-
dc.description.abstractSessile communities are regulated by biotic and abiotic forces that influence species composition and relative abundance. The top-down control exerted through predation has direct impacts on prey and indirect implications for other biota through altered competitive interactions. Concurrently, light is recognised as an important driver, especially in early successional stages, due to its influence on larval settlement. This study investigated the combined influence of light and predation by nektonic predators on sessile communities. At two locations, settlement panels were allocated to three treatments: open panels (exposed to light and accessible to predators); semi-caged panels (shaded but accessible to predators); and caged panels (shaded and inaccessible to predators). Regardless of location, community composition differed among all treatments, suggesting that communities are regulated by an interplay between light and predation. This pattern was driven by ascidians of different life forms, with colonial species dominating open panels while solitary taxa were most abundant on caged panels. Notably, there was no difference in abundance between solitary and colonial ascidians on semi-caged panels. These results suggest that together, light and predation regulate the abundance of colonial and solitary ascidians. These findings highlight the importance of considering the conjoint effect of multiple ecological factors in regulating communities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_US
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Biodiversityen_US
dc.subjectColonial ascidiansen_US
dc.subjectcommunity compositionen_US
dc.subjectfoulingen_US
dc.subjectnektonic predatorsen_US
dc.subjectsolitary ascidiansen_US
dc.subjecttunicatesen_US
dc.titleLight, shade and predation: who wins and who loses in sessile fouling communities?en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-021-01241-5-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Light_shade_and_predation.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

112
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

125
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.