Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8647
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhokane, Sylviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFlett, Bradley Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorNcube, Edsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRheeder, John Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorRose, Lindy Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-15T09:50:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-15T09:50:42Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPhokane, S., Flett, B. C., Ncube, E. et al. 2019. Agricultural practices and their potential role in mycotoxin contamination of maize and groundnut subsistence farming. South African Journal of Science, 115(9/10): 1-6. [https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6221]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-7489-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8647-
dc.description.abstractMycotoxigenic fungi are common pathogens of maize and groundnuts; they produce mycotoxins which reduce the yield and quality of these grain crops. Numerous agricultural practices including crop rotation and storage methods have been shown to impact mycotoxin accumulation. Therefore, the farming and storage practices in maize and groundnut subsistence farming systems in Pongola, Vryheid, Jozini, Manguzi and Mbazwana Districts of northern KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) were surveyed to determine their potential role in promoting or mitigating mycotoxin contamination. A questionnaire about agricultural farming practices and storage facilities was presented to 65 subsistence maize and/or groundnut farmers. At least 90% of the farmers surveyed were not aware of mycotoxins and their consequences to animal and human health. The majority of the farmers did not practise crop rotation. However, they practised intercropping and sorted damaged and mouldy grain (maize and groundnuts) before storage. The damaged or mouldy grain was largely used as animal feed, thereby exposing animals to an increased risk of mycotoxicoses. Metal tanks and inqolobane (a type of wooden structure) were identified as the most common storage structures. Harvested homegrown maize was mostly used for the farmers’ own consumption but also sometimes sold to the local community. The implementation of mycotoxin awareness campaigns is necessary, particularly in these districts. The storage facilities used by the subsistence farmers allowed increased moisture and insect invasion. The need for the surveillance of mycotoxins in subsistence-farmed food crops is vital. Significance: • The main finding of this study is the extent of post-harvest losses and mycotoxin contamination of maize produced by smallholder farmers in South Africa. • We further identify methods to manage the risk of mycotoxin exposure to smallholder farmers and their communities as well as reduce post-harvest losses.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAcademy of Science of South Africaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African Journal of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectMycotoxigenic fungien_US
dc.subjectstorageen_US
dc.subjectmycotoxinsen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.titleAgricultural practices and their potential role in mycotoxin contamination of maize and groundnut subsistence farmingen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6221-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Agricultural_practices_and_their_potential.pdfArticle534.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

94
Last Week
0
Last month
4
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

50
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.