Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8325
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Colleen L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimmons, Robert E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorling, Francesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Sharonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Koebraaen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Riain, M. Justinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T07:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-04T07:30:12Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationSeymour, C.L., Simmons, R.E., Morling, F. et. al. 2020. Caught on camera: The impacts of urban domestic cats on wild prey in an African city and neighbouring protected areas. Global Ecology and Conservation. 23. 1-12. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01198]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2351-9894-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8325-
dc.description.abstractDomestic cats (Felis catus) have contributed to the extinction of indigenous species worldwide, but impacts in Africa are unstudied. We compare prey returned home from three questionnaire surveys (2009, 2010 and 2013/14) in Cape Town, South Africa, with footage from some of the same cats wearing animal-borne video cameras (KittyCams), to assess differences in actual predation vs. returns. Cape Town borders Table Mountain National Park (TMNP), so cats may prey on animals in a protected area. Urban edge (UE) and deep urban cats (DU) did not differ in predation rates, but the suite of species killed differed significantly. KittyCams revealed that most predation was nocturnal, and only 18% of prey recorded on video were returned home, thus cats kill 5.56 times more animals (averaged across all taxa) than returns data suggest. Reptiles constituted 50% of prey, but only 17% of returns; mammals constituted 24% of prey, but 54% of returns. Non-native species represented only 6% and 17% of animals killed by UE and DU cats, respectively, pointing to a high cost of cat predation for native fauna. Applying a correction factor of 5.56, the average domestic cat in Cape Town kills c. 90 (95% CI = 59, 123), animals.year−1. Thus, the approximately 300 000 domestic cats in Cape Town kill c. 27.5 million animals.year−1, and TMNP is likely to lose c. 203 500 animals to UE cats annually from within its boundaries. The scale of this predation necessitates conservation options to minimise impacts of cats on wildlife, particularly near protected areas.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Ecology and Conservationen_US
dc.subjectAnimal-borne videoen_US
dc.subjecthuman-wildlife conflicten_US
dc.subjectkittyCamsen_US
dc.subjectthreats to species in national parksen_US
dc.subjecturban biodiversityen_US
dc.subjecturban conservationen_US
dc.titleCaught on camera: The impacts of urban domestic cats on wild prey in an African city and neighbouring protected areasen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01198-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Caught_camera.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

181
Last Week
2
Last month
13
checked on Nov 5, 2026

Download(s)

99
checked on Nov 5, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.