Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8223
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Shahiedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEhrlich, Rodneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaatjies, Roslynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Zyl-Smit, Richard N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaid-Hartley, Qonitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Rodneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorDheda, Keertanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-15T13:01:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-15T13:01:33Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationAdams, S., Ehrlich, R., Baatjies, R. et al. 2015. Incidence of occupational latent tuberculosis infection in South African healthcare workers. European Respiratory Journal, 45(5): 1364–1373. [http://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00138414]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0903-1936-
dc.identifier.issn1399-3003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8223-
dc.description.abstractThe test-specific incidence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in healthcare workers from sub-Saharan Africa is unknown. 505 healthcare workers from South Africa were screened at baseline, and after 12 months, with a questionnaire, the tuberculin skin test (TST), and two T-cell assays (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube). Test-specific conversion rates were calculated. The prevalence of presumed LTBI at baseline was 84, 69 and 62% using the TST, QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB, respectively. The annual test-specific conversion rate, depending on the cut-off point used, was as follows: TST 38%; QuantiFERON-TB Gold-In-Tube 13–22%; and T-SPOT.TB 18–22%. Annual reversion rates were 4, 7 and 16%, respectively. The annual TST conversion rate was significantly higher than that derived from published local community-based data (IRR 3.53, 95% CI 1.81– 6.88). Factors associated with conversion (any test) included healthcare sector of employment, counselling of tuberculosis patients, and a baseline positive TST (for T-SPOT.TB). The annual rate of tuberculosis infection in South African healthcare workers was very high, irrespective of the testing method used, and may be explained by occupational exposure, as the rate was considerably higher than non-healthcare workers from the same community. Collectively, these data support the need for implementation of tuberculosis-specific infection control measures in Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Respiratory Journalen_US
dc.subjectlatent tuberculosis infection (LTBI)en_US
dc.subjecthealthcare workersen_US
dc.subjectsub-Saharan Africaen_US
dc.subjectT-SPOTen_US
dc.subjectQuantiFERON-TBen_US
dc.titleIncidence of occupational latent tuberculosis infection in South African healthcare workersen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00138414-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Incidence of occupational latent.pdfArticle287.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

105
Last Week
1
Last month
7
checked on Oct 14, 2026

Download(s)

49
checked on Oct 14, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.