Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7931
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNel, Anton Pieteren_US
dc.contributor.authorLouw, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLambrechts, M.G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Rensburg, P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-20T12:11:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-20T12:11:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationNel, A.P., Louw, L., Lambrechts, M.G. & Van Rensburg, P. 2015. The influences of different winemaking techniques on the Mouthfeel of Shiraz Grapes. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 36(1): 71-93. [https://doi.org/10.21548/36-1-938]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2224-7904 (Online)-
dc.identifier.issn0253-939X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7931-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to determine the effect of ripeness and of different tannin extractionmethods on the sensory properties of wine, with a specific focus on mouthfeel properties. Quantitativedescriptive analysis (QDA) was performed to evaluate the sensory properties of 20 young Shiraz wines intwo phases. In Phase 1, wines from a cool area were evaluated and, in Phase 2, wines from a warm areawere evaluated. Clear differences were found between the wines from the two regions. Wines from thecooler region were generally associated with higher levels of total non-flavonoids and total anthocyanins,and more intense numbing and puckering sensations. In contrast, the wines from the warmer region asa group were associated with a more drying and grippy mouthfeel, as well as less total anthocyanins andtotal non-flavonoids. In the set of wines from the cooler region, the effect of ripeness was more pronouncedthan in the set of wines from the warmer region. In both cases, riper grapes resulted in a coarser surfacesmoothness, a more numbing sensation, a bitter aftertaste and less adhesive mouthfeel. The wines fromthe cooler region that were harvested at a riper stage were associated with many of the anthocyanins/anthocyanin derivatives and were negatively associated with hydroxycinnamate, procyanidin B1 anddelphinidin-3-glucoside-p-coumaric acid. In the warmer area, the riper grapes were again associated withanthocyanins/anthocyanin derivatives, but this time were strongly associated with procyanidin B2, caffeicacid, p-coumaric acid, catechin, coutaric acid and total non-flavonoids. The effect of tannin extractionmethod on the sensory properties of the wines from the warmer region was more pronounced than in thewines from the cooler region. Unfortunately, the differentiation between treatments was not consistent fromone ripeness level to the next. However, it appeared that the cold soak treatment differed the least from thecontrol, regardless of region or ripeness, whereas the post-maceration treatment differed the most basedon mouthfeel and phenolic composition. Although some mouthfeel attributes and phenolic compoundswere consistently associated with region and ripeness, it is not clear if mouthfeel can be manipulatedconsistently by tannin extraction methods.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Society of Enology & Viticulture (SASEV)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African Journal of Enology and Viticultureen_US
dc.subjectSensory propertiesen_US
dc.subjectMouthfeelen_US
dc.subjectShirazen_US
dc.subjecttannin extraction methodsen_US
dc.titleThe influences of different winemaking techniques on the mouthfeel of Shiraz Grapesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21548/36-1-938-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The Influences of Different Winemaking Techniques on the Mouthfeel of Shiraz Grapes.pdf664.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

93
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Sep 2, 2026

Download(s)

36
checked on Sep 2, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.