Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7512
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZemlina, Annalise E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarkhuizen, Mariznaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKengne, Andre Pascalen_US
dc.contributor.authorErasmus, Rajiven_US
dc.contributor.authorMatsha, Tandi Edithen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T12:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-18T12:05:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationZemlina, AE., Barkhuizen, M., Kengne, AP., et al. 2019. Performance of glycated albumin for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes diagnosis in a South African population. Clinica Chimica Acta, 488:122-128. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.005]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0009-8981-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7512-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the utility of glycated albumin (GA%) as a diagnostic marker of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in an African population. Methods: GA% levels were determined in a sample of 1294 mixed ancestry adults (74.2% women) residing in Cape Town using an enzymatic method. The participants' glycemic status was based on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results: The mean age was 47.8 years with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 28.7 kg/m2. Obesity was more pronounced in the screen-detected diabetes and prediabetes groups with mean BMI's of 32.5 kg/m2 and 31.5 kg/ m2 respectively. The optimal thresholds of GA% to diagnose screen-detected diabetes and prediabetes, were 14.90% and 12.75% respectively. For screen-detected diabetes, the C-statistic was higher for HbA1c than GA% (p=.034) with values of 0.899 (95% CI 0.855–0.943) and 0.873 (0.782–0.892) respectively. The agreement detected diabetes, was kappa=0.33 (95% CI 0.26–0.40) and was higher than the agreement for prediabetes, kappa=0.16 (0.11–0.21). The performance of GA% to identify screen-detected diabetes at the optimal threshold of 14.90%, was 64.8% (95% CI 54.1%–74.6%) for sensitivity and 93.5% (92.0%–94.9%) for specificity. GA% was significantly less sensitive, but more specific than HbA1c (at the optimal threshold of 6.15%) for screen-detected diabetes diagnosis (both p≤.002 from McNemar tests for sensitivity and specificity comparisons). Conclusions: GA% performed less well than HbA1c to identify participants with OGTT-diagnosed type 2 diabetes or prediabetes (HbA1c cut-off of 6.15% and 5.95% respectively) in this population.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinica Chimica Actaen_US
dc.subjectGlycated albuminen_US
dc.subjecttype 2 diabetesen_US
dc.subjectAfrican populationen_US
dc.subjectCape Townen_US
dc.subjectenzymatic methoden_US
dc.titlePerformance of glycated albumin for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes diagnosis in a South African populationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.11.005-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Performance of glycated albumin for type 2 diabetes.pdf1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

157
Last Week
1
Last month
4
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Download(s)

53
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.