Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7488
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDobrowskya, P.Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorLombard, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCloete, W. Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaayman, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCloete, T. Een_US
dc.contributor.authorCarstens, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sehaam.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Wesaalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T09:27:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-26T09:27:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationDobrowsky, P. H., Lombard, M., Cloete, W. J. et al. 2015. Efficiency of Microfiltration Systems for the Removal of Bacterial and Viral Contaminants from Surface and Rainwater. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 226(3): 14 pages. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2317-6]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0049-6979-
dc.identifier.issn1573-2932-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7488-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a passive point-of-use treatment system, namely, a polyvinyl (alcohol) (PVA) nanofiber membrane/activated carbon column, for the treatment of harvested rainwater. The efficiency of SMI-Q10 [quaternized poly (styrene-co-maleimide)] nanofiber membrane disks placed in a filtration assembly for the treatment of surface water (Plankenburg River, Western Cape, South Africa) and harvested rainwater was also assessed. Two rainwater harvesting tanks were installed at the Welgevallen Experimental farm, Stellenbosch, South Africa, with the filtration system intermittently attached to the tanks for collection of rainwater samples throughout the study period. Parameters used to monitor the filtration systems included heterotrophic bacteria, Escherichia coli, and total coliform enumeration and the presence/absence of adenovirus. When compared to drinking water guidelines, the results indicated that 3 L of potable water could be produced by the synthe- sized PVA nanofiber membrane/activated carbon col- umn. However, PCR assays indicated that adenovirus and numerous bacteria such as Klebsiella spp., Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp., and Yersinia spp. were not effectively removed by the filtration system utilized. Additionally, the SMI-Q10 nanofiber mem- brane disks did not remove viruses from the river or tank water samples as bovine adenovirus 3 strain, simian adenovirus, and human adenovirus A strain were detect- ed in all water samples analyzed. Thus, while the microfiltration system was efficient in reducing the level of indicator organisms to within drinking water stan- dards, further optimization of the electrospun filtration membranes is required as molecular analysis revealed that numerous opportunistic bacterial pathogens and viruses persisted after filtrationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofWater, Air, & Soil Pollutionen_US
dc.subjectMicrofiltrationen_US
dc.subjectAdenovirusen_US
dc.subjectOpportunistic pathogensen_US
dc.subjectIndicator bacteriaen_US
dc.subjectNanofiber membraneen_US
dc.subjectElectrospinningen_US
dc.subjectRainwater harvestingen_US
dc.subjectSurface wateren_US
dc.titleEfficiency of Microfiltration Systems for the Removal of Bacterial and Viral Contaminants from Surface and Rainwateren_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2317-6-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

101
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Download(s)

102
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.