Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7445
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGamieldien, Razaanen_US
dc.contributor.authorStemmet, Lisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaver, Jasmitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFortuin, Elrenciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorClarke-Farr, Peter Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-13T13:22:38Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationGamieldien, R., Stemmet, L., Javer, J. et al. 2018. Emerging technologies in artificial ocular devices: a systematic review. African Vision and Eye Health, 77(1): a428. [https://doi.org/10.4102/ aveh.v77i1.428]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2410-1516-
dc.identifier.issn2413-3183-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7445-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recent developments in vision restoration include visual prostheses designed to electrically stimulate artifi vision in those who have lost their sight. Major efforts in this area include multi-electrode arrays surgically implanted at various placement areas throughout the visual pathway. Visual prosthetic devices are named according to these placement areas (cortical, optic nerve, sub-retinal and epiretinal). These devices attempt to restore sight for retinal degenerative diseases such as Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) and Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). Aim: To summarise the emerging technologies in the development of artificial ocular devices. Methods: The search methodology comprised seven databases for articles published between January 2000 and March 2017. Outcome data were analysed descriptively with results summarised in a Microsoft Excel database. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were used, and the main findings are discussed in a narrative format. Results: Eighty-nine full-text articles were included in this systematic review. Conclusion: The primary goal of these artificial devices is to provide functional vision in order to perform normal daily activities. Even though recent clinical trials in certain countries have shown advances in the development of various vision-restoring devices, they do not produce the same experience for the majority of patients and are unable to completely restore normal vision. The most common type of device according to its placement is the epiretinal device which is also the most successful device as determined in the majority of clinical trials.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Vision and Eye Healthen_US
dc.subjectArtificial retinal devicesen_US
dc.subjectartificial ocular devicesen_US
dc.subjectvision restorationen_US
dc.subjectbionic eyeen_US
dc.subjectvisual implantsen_US
dc.subjectvisual prosthesisen_US
dc.titleEmerging technologies in artificial ocular devices: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4102/ aveh.v77i1.428-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Emerging technologies in artificial ocular devices.pdf936.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

98
Last Week
1
Last month
6
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Download(s)

45
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.