Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7190
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMkruqulwa, U. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOkudoh, Vincent Ifeanyien_US
dc.contributor.authorOyekola, O. O.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-19T08:29:06Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-19T08:29:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationMkruqulwa, U.L., Okudoh, V.I., & Oyekola, O.O. 2019. Optimizing methane production from co-digestion of cassava biomass and winery solid waste using response surface methodology. Waste and Biomass Valorization [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00801-y]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-2641-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7190-
dc.description.abstractRenewable energy security for the future and better use of natural resources are key challenges that can be concurrently managed by a practical anaerobic co-digestion approach where substrates with a high carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio are combined with lower ones to create a balance of the nutrients during the production of methane. This study determined the optimal conditions for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of cassava biomass (CB) and winery solid waste (WSW) using response surface methodology (RSM). A three-factor central composite design was used to set-up the anaerobic co-digestion experiments. The individual and interactive effects of temperature (25–45 °C), pH 6–8 and a range of substrate (CB/WSW) ratios (0–100) on the methane yield were explored. Optimisation using RSM showed a close fit between the predicted and experimental data as indicated by the coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.9521. The RSM model predicted a maximum methane yield of 346.28 mL CH4/g VSadded for the optimal conditions of pH 7, temperature of 35 °C ± 0.5 and 70/30 ratio of CB/WSW. The verification experiment produced 396 mL CH4/g VSadded, 12.6% higher than the predicted value at the same conditions. Although, there was a gap between the predicted and actual yield, the significance of the variables in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows the model could be relevant to similar research. The substrate ratio at 70 CB:30 WSW was the most significant factor during methane production. The RSM model proved successful in the optimisation process of methane yield.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Research Foundation (NRF), South Africaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofWaste and Biomass Valorizationen_US
dc.subjectMethaneen_US
dc.subjectWineries -- Waste disposalen_US
dc.subjectCassava -- Industrial applicationsen_US
dc.subjectWaste products as fuelen_US
dc.subjectWine and wine making -- By-productsen_US
dc.subjectRenewable energy sourcesen_US
dc.titleOptimizing methane production from co-digestion of cassava biomass and winery solid waste using response surface methodologyen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00801-y-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mkruqulwa, Okudoh and Oyekola Optimising methane production 2019.pdfPublished online997.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

81
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Download(s)

76
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.