Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6579
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMazwayi, Vusien_US
dc.contributor.authorBooi, Kwaneleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T09:49:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-14T09:49:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isbn9788409027095-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/6579-
dc.descriptionConference Proceedingen_US
dc.description.abstractDeveloping countries are routinely associated with wide disparities between social classes have often been observed in developing countries such as South Africa. Such social stratification is in many cases caused by governments who adopt ideologies from well-developed countries without reflecting upon the context in which such ideologies are to exist. The University of Technology, at which this case study was conducted, typifies the inequality in social classes from which students are drawn. This study aimed at focusing on student experience in conducting practical work in a laboratory environment. A purposive sampling strategy was chosen with the aim of investigating the effect of prior exposure of first-year Life Sciences students to the laboratory environment. Life Sciences in its nature require students to be acquainted with both content knowledge and practical work knowledge. In identifying preparedness of first year Life Science for university education, it has been observed that these students have manifested signs of socio-economic disparity in execution of practical conducted in laboratory environments. The researcher observed manifestations of these differences in laboratory practical activities: such as microscopic, taxonomy, measurement skills required as knowledge learnt prior to their enrolment in education. This study was underpinned by Bourdieu’s, scientific capital and cultural capital as well as Maton’s Legitimation Code Theory. Such theories address disciplinary knowledge that endows Life Sciences students with peculiar skills: lacking or debilitated by poor secondary school training. Results of this study revealed that there are indeed visible differences in the way that students executed selected Life Sciences practical activities introduced in the Life Sciences laboratory. Such discrepancies were relatable to differences in schooling. Some students were drawn from schools where practical activities were not conducted while other groups of students in the sample for this study were adequately prepared to conduct experiments independently. This study concluded that South African academics need to be more aware of the social dynamics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEDULEARNen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectDifferent social backgroundsen_US
dc.subjectLaboratoryen_US
dc.subjectLife Sciences educationen_US
dc.subjectPractical worken_US
dc.subjectPre-service teachersen_US
dc.titleHow prepared are First-year Life Sciences pre-service teachers for the laboratory learning environment? A case study at a University of Technologyen_US
dc.type.patentOtheren_US
dc.relation.conferenceEDULEARN (10th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. 2-4 July, 2018. Palma de Mallorca, Spain.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21125/edulearn.2018.0240-
Appears in Collections:Edu - Conference Proceedings
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mazwayi_Vusi_Booi_Kwanele_Edu_2018.pdfConference Proceeding172.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

71
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Download(s)

31
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons