Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6141| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Westraadt, Georina | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-07T07:23:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-07T07:23:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1753-5913 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6141 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In a search for fresh forms of formative assessment that promotes student learning and encourage students to take responsibility for their own learning, a reflective study was conducted after two assessment instruments were applied in the evaluation of first-year B.Ed. students in Art Education. The first assessment was designed to assist students to overcome their apprehension about mark-making (drawing) and with the second, consideration was given to whether assessments prepared students for a lifetime of learning. Many first-year students entering their teacher training have not done any art since primary school. As part of the B.Ed. course they are required to produce a practical portfolio where they apply the art elements. For some students, this is a daunting task because they have very little confidence in their own creative ability. As a strategy to overcome their initial fear of drawing, a River of Life (Fisher and White 2015) exercise was introduced to set off their practical work. The theoretical component of the B.Ed. 1 course in Art Education comprises of a) the didactics of the subject and b) basic background knowledge of South African art and artists. A component of this work is assessed by means of a written test, but in the past the outcome was very poor. In an attempt to improve their lack of knowledge in this regard, instead of a written test, students were required to come to class with prepared notes and using that, had to design a flowchart as if in preparation for a slide show of a particular component of the work. Some examples of the end results of the River of Life drawings were analysed and will be discussed to establish whether it could be considered a reliable instrument to assess the ability of B.Ed. 1 students in the practical application of the elements of art. Results of the flowcharts as part of the theory assessment have been analysed to ascertain whether it has been a reliable assessment tool for this particular component of their course, enabling students to source and apply knowledge about art and artists of South Africa | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | South African Journal of Higher Education | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/ | - |
| dc.subject | Formative assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject | Art Education | en_US |
| dc.subject | Practical work | en_US |
| dc.subject | Theoretical component | en_US |
| dc.title | A new take on the assessment of first-year art projects | en_US |
| dc.type.patent | Article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.28535/31-6-1607 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A NEW TAKE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF FIRST-YEAR ART PROJECTS.pdf | Main Article | 711.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
99
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Sep 2, 2026
Download(s)
30
checked on Sep 2, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License