Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5999| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Meda, Lawrence | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Swart, Arthur James | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-21T12:19:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-21T12:19:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0949-149X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5999 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Industry and accreditation bodies around the world require graduates to be able to demonstrate specific graduate attributes. Universities in this 21st century have responded to that call by embedding graduate attributes into their curricula. However, how can individual academics ensure that they are incorporating and assessing graduate attributes in their respective modules, which form part of the overall curriculum? This research question necessitates reflection as many academics are struggling to come to terms with what many of these graduate attributes really mean or entail. Moreover, a dearth of research publications exists on trying to define and explain these graduate attributes. The purpose of this article is to determine to what extent have the 10 graduate attributes, adopted by the Central University of Technology been embedded into the curriculum of the National Diploma in Electrical Engineering. A qualitative case study was used and data was collected using documentary review. All 36 study guides of the Electrical Engineering qualification were analysed. Results of this study show that 9 out of 10 graduate attributes are spread across the entire curriculum. The four most dominate graduate attributes were found to be Innovation and Problem Solving; Technical and Conceptual Competence; Numeracy, and Technological Literacy. Certain graduate attributes are clearly discerned in the learning outcomes while others are hidden in different teaching and learning activities. A key recommendation of this study is for academics to structure their learning outcomes in a way that addresses the incorporation and assessment of key graduate attributes required. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | International Journal of Engineering Education | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/ | - |
| dc.subject | Graduate attributes | en_US |
| dc.subject | Indicators | en_US |
| dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
| dc.subject | Outcomes | en_US |
| dc.title | Graduate attributes in an electrical engineering curriculum: A case study | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | International Journal of Engineering Education 2017. 33(2(A)): 653–661 | en_US |
| dc.type.patent | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meda_Lawrence_Swart_Arthur James_Gaduate Attributes in an Engineering _.pdf | Main article | 307.15 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
221
Last Week
0
0
Last month
2
2
checked on Sep 21, 2026
Download(s)
98
checked on Sep 21, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License