Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5987
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohn, lgnatiusen_US
dc.contributor.authorAllie, Saalihen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-17T13:46:46Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-17T13:46:46Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.issn0143-0807-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/38/1/015701-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/5987-
dc.description.abstractThis is the first part of a broader study, exploring the contextual variations of the responses of 149 first year (non-physics major) university students at two South African universities in Cape Town. The data analysis was done in terms of the (i) forced choice responses (FCR), (ii) free written responses and (iii) personal interviews. This paper presents the development of the instrument (aspects of circuits questionnaire, or ACQ) used in the exploratory study and the results obtained from the FCR analysis of 60 students. The results showed that the student responses are triggered by the context framed by the questions and the results obtained from investigations using light bulbs cannot be generalised and may be reinterpreted.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEuropean Journal of Physicsen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectContexten_US
dc.subjectDC circuitsen_US
dc.subjectResistive elementsen_US
dc.titleDC circuits: I. Evidence for fine grained contextual dependence*en_US
dc.type.patentArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

59
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons