Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5986| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | John, lgnatius | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Allie, Saalih | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-17T13:29:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-17T13:29:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0143-0807 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5986 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/38/1/015702 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This is the second part of a broader investigation which explores the reasons behind the contextual variations in student responses at a fine-grained level. In the previous article (John 2017 Eur. J. Phys. 38 015701) it was established that the students' responses are highly context dependent at a fine-grained level. This article presents the reason for the contextual variations of student responses from their free written responses. The result indicates that students who are being triggered by the productive resources during the engagement with the task will arrive at the correct (canonical) conclusion and those triggered by the unproductive resources will arrive at an incorrect conclusion. We identified the productive foothold ideas in a simple DC circuit with a single resistive element. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | European Journal of Physics | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/ | - |
| dc.subject | Foothold ideas | en_US |
| dc.subject | DC circuits | en_US |
| dc.subject | Context | en_US |
| dc.subject | Resistive elements | en_US |
| dc.subject | Light bulb | en_US |
| dc.title | DC circuits: II. Identification of foothold ideas in DC circuits | en_US |
| dc.type.patent | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised) | |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License