Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Pink flower preference in sunbirds does not translate into plant fitness differences in a polymorphic Erica species
Authors: Heystek, Anina 
Geerts, Sjirk 
Barnard, Phoebe 
Pauw, Anton 
Keywords: Bird-pollination;Cape Floristic Region;Colour polymorphism;Flower constancy;Nectar robbing;Optimal foraging
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Springer
Abstract: Bird-pollinated plants typically have reddish flowers, but it is not clear whether this trait can be attributed to selection by birds. Here we experimentally test for the first time the foraging behaviour of sunbirds in relation to flower colour, using the Orangebreasted Sunbird Anthobaphes violacea (Nectariniidae) and the colour dimorphic Erica perspicua (Ericaceae). Pink and white flower morphotypes co-flower in intermixed populations and have similar nectar volumes and concentrations. Using floral arrays in a field aviary, we found that sunbirds preferred pink flowers; 95 % of their first choices were to pink inflorescences and they visited and probed more pink inflorescences and flowers, respectively. We also tested for flower constancy (the tendency to move between same colour rather than different colour morphotypes), but found no evidence for this in the sequence of their foraging choices, indicating that this mechanism did not maintain flower colour differences in sympatry. There was evidence for optimal foraging: 80 % of moves were to adjacent inflorescences. Unexpectedly, the preference for pink flowers observed in the aviary did not translate into a female fitness advantage for this morphotype in the field,since no difference is found in natural pollination rate, fruit or seed set.
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Heystek_A_Geerts_S_Barnard_P_Pauw_AppSci_2014.pdfMain Article358.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jun 4, 2023


checked on Jun 4, 2023

Google ScholarTM


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons