Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/3259
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraund, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorScholtz, Zena-
dc.contributor.authorSadeck, Melanie-
dc.contributor.authorKoopman, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorBraund, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorScholtz, Zena-
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-30T10:18:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-30T10:18:15Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifierhttp://dx. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.007en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/3259-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059312000417en
dc.description.abstractSouth African student teachers were studied to see how they coped with requirements to teach science using argumentation. Lesson observations, plans, reflective logs, post-teaching interviews and assessment of pupils’ argumentation were used to compare student teachers’ preparedness and interactions with pupils. Two clusters of students were identified representing high preparedness and low interaction. A high degree of preparedness alone did not guarantee high levels of argumentation. Schools’ educational situations were independent of success in teaching argumentation. The outcomes and implications for further development of teaching critical thinking are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectCritical thinkingen_US
dc.subjectArgumentationen_US
dc.subjectStudent teachersen_US
dc.subjectScienceen_US
dc.titleFirst steps in teaching argumentation: A South African studyen_US
dc.type.patentArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

85
Last Week
0
Last month
6
checked on Sep 2, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons