Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10967
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMayoma, Bahatien_US
dc.contributor.authorYusuph, Mamlo A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSailas, Hellenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmanuel, Zagaloen_US
dc.contributor.authorLukanga, Editrudithen_US
dc.contributor.authorKitogo, Lawrenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdson, Adventina A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSimbila, Deogratiusen_US
dc.contributor.authorMugema, Arthuren_US
dc.contributor.authorMatonya, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKasenene, Fanuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Christinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSparks, Conraden_US
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Farhan R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-30T09:09:03Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-30T09:09:03Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationMayoma, B.S. et al. 2025. Abundance and characteristics of anthropogenic litter along the Tanzanian shores of the African Great Lakes: including volunteer involvement, outreach, and stakeholder engagement in a holistic approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32: 1427-1414. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36528-8]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10967-
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental pollution due to mismanaged anthropogenic litter is one of the most pressing issues facing the world today. To reduce existing environmental burdens of litter, clean-up events have increased in popularity. Here, we report on the results of the Clean Shores, Great Lakes project, in which we conducted 69 volunteer-based clean-ups along the Tanzanian shorelines of the African Great Lakes (Victoria, Tanganyika, and Nyasa (also known as Lake Malawi)). A total of 5483 volunteers engaged with the project across all clean-up sites, collecting 431,328 pieces (25,981 kg) of anthropogenic litter. Expressing the data as normalized to area (items m−2) or effort (items individual−1 h−1) revealed that the interpretation of a polluted site varies with units, highlighting the need for consistency in the field. Litter density varied from 0.06 to 13.89 items m−2 and 5.2–706 items individual−1 h−1. Plastics were the major litter type constituting 75% of all litter (mean = 74.2 ± 12.5% across all sites), while clothing (10.9 ± 9.5%) and fishing gear (3.7 ± 5.2%) were also prevalent. Two items constituted > 40% of all collected litter, namely plastic beverage bottles (average 23.7 ± 17.1%, range 0–72.9%) and plastic bags (average 19.7 ± 13.2%, range 1–50.3%). Prioritizing intervention measures on these two items could reduce litter leakage significantly. Furthermore, a holistic approach was undertaken through voluntary engagement, citizen science involvement, stakeholder dissemination, and school visits to increase public awareness. Clean-up data when disseminated to relevant policymakers and stakeholders can motivate activity for the environmental management of anthropogenic litter and plastic pollution.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.subjectAnthropogenic litteren_US
dc.subjectPlastic pollutionen_US
dc.subjectCitizen scienceen_US
dc.subjectOutreach and educationen_US
dc.subjectFreshwateren_US
dc.subjectEast Africaen_US
dc.titleAbundance and characteristics of anthropogenic litter along the Tanzanian shores of the African Great Lakes: including volunteer involvement, outreach, and stakeholder engagement in a holistic approachen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36528-8-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abundance_and_characteristics_of_anthropogenic_litter.pdf2.65 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.