Cosmetic outcomes of the first bodybuilder using a low-cost modified culture technique for burn wound coverage: a case report and long-term follow-up

Abstract

Cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) serve as an alternative permanent skin replacement, though high costs often limit their use in resource-constrained settings and to life-saving cases. This case report presents the first documented cosmetic application of a modified CEA technique in a bodybuilder, demonstrating favorable aesthetic outcomes. A 28-year-old Black male with a 20% total body surface area burn sustained in a domestic fire exhibited superficial and deep partial-thickness burns to the face, arms, torso, and feet. Refusing grafts from visible donor sites, treatment using a low-cost modified CEA AcademicEditor: JeremyGoverman Received: 19March2025 Revised: 7May2025 Accepted: 16May2025 Published: 3 June2025 Citation: Kleintjes, W.G.; Prinsloo, T.K. Cosmetic Outcomesof the First Bodybuilder Using a Low-CostModified CultureTechnique for Burn WoundCoverage: ACase Report andLong-TermFollow-Up. Eur. Burn J. 2025, 6, 29. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ebj6020029 Copyright: ©2025bytheauthors. Published by MDPIon behalf of the EuropeanBurnsAssociation. Licensee MDPI,Basel,Switzerland. Thisarticle is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution(CC BY)license (https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/). approach was employed to minimize donor site morbidity. Keratinocytes harvested from a groin biopsy were cultured on Cutimed Sorbact® (Essity AB, BSN Medical (Pty) Ltd., Pinetown, RSA) dressings with autogenous plasma and hydrogel supplementation and incubated at 37 ◦C for two weeks. Xenografts provided temporary coverage before CEA transplantation. Graft take was 85%, with minor (15%) loss at 21 days, requiring small autograft coverage. At two months, the Vancouver Scar Scale score was 4, indicating optimal pigmentation, smoother texture, and minimal scarring. These findings align with limited studies on CEAs for cosmetic applications, suggesting this cost-effective technique may broaden the scope of CEAs beyond life-saving interventions to include aesthetic reconstruction, reducing both donor site morbidity and scarring.