Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10600
Title: A review and comparison of methods of parameter estimation and inference for heteroskedastic linear regression models
Authors: Farrar, Thomas 
Blignaut, Renette 
Luus, Retha 
Steel, Sarel 
Keywords: Heteroskedasticity;Linear;Regression;Estimation;Inference
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Source: Farrar, T. et al. 2025. A review and comparison of methods of parameter estimation and inference for heteroskedastic linear regression models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 52(16): 3091-3120. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2025.2496719]
Journal: Journal of Applied Statistics 
Abstract: This article reviews methods of parameter estimation and inference in the linear regression model under heteroskedasticity. Several approaches to feasible weighted least squares estimation of the parameter vector are reviewed, along with various heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators, which are usually designed with inference as the end goal. A Monte Carlo experiment is designed to evaluate the ability of the reviewed methods to estimate three quantities: the variances of the random errors, the parameter vector, and the standard error of the ordinary least squares estimator thereof. Results of the experiment show that the homoskedastic variance estimator performs well at estimating error variances even in the heteroskedastic data-generating processes studied. Feasible weighted least squares approaches perform best for estimation of the parameter vector, whereas heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators perform best for estimation of the standard error thereof. This motivates a search for a method that would perform well in all three respects.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10600
ISSN: 0266-4763
1360-0532 (Online)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2025.2496719
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Not Open Access.pdf22.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.