Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10528
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgajilo, Dorothyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Shahiedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaatjies, Roslynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeebhay, Mohamed Fareeden_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-03T10:24:24Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-03T10:24:24Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationNgajilo, D. et al. 2025. Seaweed farming in Tanzania: a study of working practices and geospatial analysis of occupational hazards and adverse health outcomes. Journal of Agromedicine, 30(2): 237-249. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2407986]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-924X-
dc.identifier.issn1545-0813 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10528-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Work in seafood harvesting and processing has been associated with a range of occupational hazards and associated health problems. However, limited information exists regarding the occupational health risks among workers engaged in seaweed handling. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to map seaweed co-operatives (n = 45), assess working practices, and identify common work-related symptoms, occupational hazards, and interventions in seaweed farming sites (n = 24), across three regions of Zanzibar, Tanzania. Results: Seaweed farming in Zanzibar primarily involves the cultivation of Eucheuma Spinosum, with the majority of workers being women. Common work-related symptoms identified include musculoskeletal symptoms, mainly affecting the wrist (87%), back (84%) and lower limbs (73%). Furthermore, a significant proportion of workers were reported to have skin problems (80%) as well as heat and asthma-related symptoms (51%). Walk-through hazard evaluations of work sites identified a range of occupational hazards, with ergonomic (58–68%), biological (50–63%) and chemical (55–65%) hazards obtaining higher scores across the three regions. Geospatial analysis revealed regional variations in occupational hazards and work-related symptom prevalence, with Unguja South having a statistically significant (p < .05) higher mean prevalence of skin symptoms (95%) and Mjini Magharibi region reporting a higher prevalence of lower limb pain (100%), back pain (100%), and heat-related symptoms (90%). Despite the high hazard scores, interventions were generally lacking across all regions. Conclusion: Occupational health hazards and adverse health outcomes vary across seaweed farming and processing regions. Tailored interventions will be key to improving workplace health and safety of workers engaged in this sector.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Agromedicineen_US
dc.subjectAquacultureen_US
dc.subjectGeospatial analysisen_US
dc.subjectOccupational hazardsen_US
dc.subjectOccupational health and safetyen_US
dc.subjectSeaweed farmingen_US
dc.titleSeaweed farming in Tanzania: a study of working practices and geospatial analysis of occupational hazards and adverse health outcomesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2024.2407986-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Seaweed_Farming_in_Tanzania.pdf2.22 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

63
checked on Oct 13, 2026

Download(s)

27
checked on Oct 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.