Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10317
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLutaka, Magdalenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpeelman, Aladdinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Subhadranaleneen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamunyela, Roswitaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-10T09:46:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-10T09:46:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationLutaka, M. et al. 2024. Quality audits of nuclear medicine practices in a middle-income African setting. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 71(2): 186-193. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.743]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2051-3895-
dc.identifier.issn2051-3909 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10317-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) introduced a Quality Management Audits in Nuclear Medicine (QUANUM) programme, to improve nuclear medicine practice standards aligned with international standards through self-assessments. The absence of quality management audits in nuclear medicine departments could potentially result in a compromise in the safety and quality of patient care. To date, there is no evidence that quality audits have been conducted in nuclear medicine departments of this middle-income country. This quality audit, therefore, assessed conformance to the IAEA QUANUM programme in four nuclear medicine departments. Methods: The study adopted a quantitative methodological exploratory approach. The IAEA QUANUM programme was used to audit nuclear medicine services' overall activity such as clinical practice, management, radiopharmacy, general and radiation safety, quality assurance, operations and services. The data was collected via document analysis in four nuclear medicine department identified as Sites A–D. Results: Overall results showed that Site A conformed with 247 out of 370 (67%) counts and non-conformed with 123 out of 370 (33%) counts whilst Site B conformed with 205 out of 342 (60%) counts and non-conformed with 137 out of 342 counts (40%). Site C conformed with 259 out of 345 (75%) counts and non-conformed with 86 out of 345 (25%) counts. Site D conformed with 166 out of 349 (48%) counts and non-conformed with 183 out of 349 (52%) counts. The study yielded 125 overall recommendations. Conclusions: All the sites demonstrated good compliance to international standards in radionuclide therapy. Site A complied poorly in strategies and policies, whilst Site B complied poorly in quality control of equipment. Site C showed poor compliance to human resource development and Site D showed aspects pertaining to administration and management as well as evaluation of quality systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Radiation Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectAuditen_US
dc.subjectConformanceen_US
dc.subjectInternational reference standardsen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.subjectQUANUMen_US
dc.titleQuality audits of nuclear medicine practices in a middleincome African settingen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.743-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Quality_audits_of_nuclear_medicine_practices.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

107
Last Week
2
Last month
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Download(s)

21
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.