Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10263
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgonda, Tiyamikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNkhoma, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorFalayi, Thaboen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-31T08:47:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-31T08:47:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationNgonda, T., Nkhoma, R. & Falayi, T. 2024. Work-integrated learning placement in engineering education: a comparative contextual analysis of public universities in Malawi, Namibia and South Africa. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 14(1): 41-54. [https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2023-0040]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2042-3896-
dc.identifier.issn2042-390X (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10263-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The study compares how work-integrated learning (WIL) placement positioning, duration, assessment strategies and environment at three Southern African universities influence engineering students' academic and employability outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: The study used a qualitative case study approach that drew on the principles of collaborative autoethnography (CAE). The researchers reflected on WIL placement practices, structure, assessment, environment and outcomes at their universities and then analysed the reflections using comparative descriptive techniques. Findings: The study reports no uniformity among the universities in positioning WIL placement in the curriculum. It is done during end-of-year vacations, between the penultimate and final year or in the last year. The study found WIL placement positioning does not influence academic outcomes; however, the influence on employability outcomes needs further investigation. Components of WIL placement assessment are similar, presentations, logbooks and reports. However, there are differences in the weightings of the various assessment components and the contribution of the industry supervisor. There is a growing trend towards placing students within universities to mitigate the challenges of limited opportunities of placements available in the industry. The impact of this also needs to be further investigated. Lastly, there are policy-related challenges in placing international students. Work restrictions on student visas limit international students’ access to WIL placement. Southern African universities need to lobby the waivers to student visa restrictions that limit their participation in WIL programs if there are to succeed in their internationalisation efforts. Originality/value: The study highlights the gaps in understanding Southern African universities' WIL placement practices, particularly relating to the positioning of WIL placement in the curriculum, the assessment methods used and the theory to work integration and employability outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education, Skills and Work-based Learningen_US
dc.subjectWork-integrated learningen_US
dc.subjectWIL placementen_US
dc.subjectComparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectEngineering studentsen_US
dc.subjectEmployabilityen_US
dc.subjectSouthern Africaen_US
dc.titleWork-integrated learning placement in engineering education: a comparative contextual analysis of public universities in Malawi, Namibia and South Africaen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2023-0040-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Work_integrated_learning.pdf630.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

159
Last Week
3
Last month
checked on Oct 13, 2026

Download(s)

49
checked on Oct 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.