Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10145| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Ferreira, Salamon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | ’t Sas-Rolfes, Michael | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Balfour, Dave | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Barichievy, Chris | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Chege, Geoffrey | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Dean, Cathy | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Doak, N. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Dublin, H.T. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | du Toit, R. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Emslie, R.H. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Flamand, Jacques | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Gadd, M. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Gaymer, J. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Hofmeyr, Markus | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Knight, Mike | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Moodley, Yoshan | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Shaw, J. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Versteege, L. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Vigne, Lucy | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | von Houwald, Friederike | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Uri-Khob, S. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Mosweu, Keitumetse | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-14T07:45:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-14T07:45:43Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ferreira, S.M. et al. 2024. Risky conclusions regarding shrinking rhino horns. People and Nature, 6(3): 1015-1018. [https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10552] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2575-8314 (Online) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10145 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract 1. Image-based analyses from an online repository on rhino horns asserted that declines in size over time could be the consequence of poaching and hunting. 2. We provide reflections on whether the sample was representative enough to make generalizations, the study adequately accounted for the main sources of horn-size variation and the statistical methods were adequate to be confident in the results. 3. The sample had a limited representation, most coming from zoo animals. We highlight several sources of variance in horn size that such a sample could not evaluate robustly using linear regressions, both for establishing a proxy for horn size corrected for size of a rhino and assessing trends over time. 4. Nevertheless, horn poaching continues to be the key threat to rhinos. Addressing the underlying drivers of poaching and trafficking are key priorities for responsible public debate, policy making and interventions. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | People and Nature | en_US |
| dc.subject | Poaching | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rhino horn | en_US |
| dc.subject | Trophy hunting | en_US |
| dc.title | Risky conclusions regarding shrinking rhino horns | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10552 | - |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risky_conclusions_regarding_shrinking_rhino_horns.pdf | 203.06 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
130
Last Week
2
2
Last month
9
9
checked on Aug 13, 2026
Download(s)
74
checked on Aug 13, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.