Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10087
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkenwa-Vincent, Emmanuel E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNaidoo, Jyotien_US
dc.contributor.authorClarke-Farr, Peter Christopheren_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T08:55:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-23T08:55:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationOkenwa-Vincent, E.E., Naidoo, J. & Clarke-Farr, P.C. 2024. Prevalence and socio-demographic distribution of uncorrected refractive errors in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenya. Ophthalmology Journal, 9: 45-52. [https://doi.org/10.5603/oj.96882]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2450-7873-
dc.identifier.issn2450-9930 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10087-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Efforts to mitigate vision loss due to uncorrected refractive errors (UREs) in Africa remain unpredictable. This study investigated the prevalence and socio-demographic distribution of UREs in school-going adolescents of Kakamega County in Kenya. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with randomly selected secondary school adolescents. Participants were screened and clinically examined for URE types and dioptric strength and were administered questionnaires designed to elicit socio-demographic, socioeconomic, and perceived well-being information. RESULTS: 165 students, aged 17.50 ± 1.576 years, were included in the study. The prevalence of URE was found to be 8.65%, for which 27% of all UREs were significant. URE types were classified as astigmatism (52%), myopia (25%), and hyperopia (23%). Astigmatism and hyperopia were more common among males (59% and 61%, respectively) than females, while myopia occurred slightly more among females (51%) than males. Most participants (72%) were from large families, 92% had parents who were poorly educated, 85% had poor occupational statuses, and 89% were from rural settings. The interclass differences in all the pre-defined socio-demographic statuses were not significant (p > 0.05), including the within-group interaction with UREs. The distributions were significantly different (p < 0.05) for well being, with over two-thirds of the participants reporting poor-to-fair perceived well-being, with a recent known history of poor eye health. CONCLUSIONS: URE is highly prevalent among school-going adolescents in Kakamega County. The study recommends intensified strategies to increase spectacle uptake among learners in rural settings and of low socioeconomic means.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVia Medicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmology Journalen_US
dc.subjectSchool-going adolescentsen_US
dc.subjectSociodemographicen_US
dc.subjectUncorrected refractive erroren_US
dc.subjectVision functionen_US
dc.subjectWell-beingen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and socio-demographic distribution of uncorrected refractive errors in school-going adolescents in Kakamega County, Kenyaen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5603/oj.96882-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prevalence_and_socio_demographic_distribution_of_uncorrected_refractive_errors.pdf714.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

109
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

43
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.