Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/9179
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDreyer, Marethaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-03T06:27:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-03T06:27:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationDreyer, M. 2022. Years in the waiting room: a feminist ethnography of the invisible institutional living spaces of forced displacement. In: Beeckmans L., Gola A., Singh A., & Heynen, H. (ed) Making Home(s) in Displacement: Critical Reflections on a Spatial Practice, 8: 197-218. [https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/258/oa_edited_volume/chapter/3062786]en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789462702936-
dc.identifier.urihttps://muse.jhu.edu/pub/258/oa_edited_volume/chapter/3062786-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/9179-
dc.description.abstractChanges in migration patterns, together with a global increase in the “securitization of migration” (Huysmans, 2000), have led to a growing number of people worldwide finding themselves in situations of forced immobility – waiting for indefinite periods of time. Asylum seekers who have sought international protection in a host country, but whose claims for refugee status have not been determined, are often caught up in the uncertainty of such prolonged conditions of displacement (Doná, 2015). Large-scale accommodation in camps and institutional settings provided by governments and humanitarian organisations are often intended as temporary measures to provide for an immediate need for shelter, but many asylum seekers end up in these settings for years. In these liminal spaces, displaced individuals are faced with the challenge of turning shelter into home (Boccagni, this book; see also Szczepanikova, 2012; Van der Horst, 2004; Vandevoordt, 2017). Hyndman and Giles describe in their article, Waiting for what? The feminization of asylum in protracted situations (2011), that asylum seekers on the move are viewed by governments in the global North as a potential liability or even a security threat. State policies aim to immobilise asylum seekers and fix them to place in refugee camps or institutional accommodation centres. In these spaces asylum seekers are feminised by rendering them as “passive, helpless, static” (p. 363) in order to reduce the threat that temporary status poses. While reception or “welcome” centres – as the institutional settings providing shelter for asylum seekers are also referred to – lack the iconic typological characteristics of the refugee camp, these more formal spaces of displacement, together with the experiences of their residents, are less frequently acknowledged and studied (Sanyal, 2019).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLeuven University Pressen_US
dc.subjectYearsen_US
dc.subjectwaiting roomen_US
dc.subjectfeminist ethnographyen_US
dc.subjectinvisibleen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional living spacesen_US
dc.subjectforced displacementen_US
dc.titleYears in the waiting room: a feminist ethnography of the invisible institutional living spaces of forced displacementen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
Appears in Collections:FID - Books / Book Chapters
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Years_in_the_Waiting_Room.pdf1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

137
Last Week
0
Last month
16
checked on Dec 29, 2025

Download(s)

126
checked on Dec 29, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.