Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8324
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHattingh, Chrisen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruwer, Juan-Pierréen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T07:24:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-04T07:24:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationHattingh, C. & Bruwer, J.P. 2020. Cape Town’s gay village: from “gaytrified” tourism Mecca to “heterosexualised” urban space. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 6(4): 907-928. [https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-10-2019-0193]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2056-5607-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8324-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to ascertain the factors that led to Cape Town’s gay village to transform from a “gaytrified” tourism mecca to a “heterosexualised” urban space, from a gay leisure space owner perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Empirical observations of the six remaining gay leisure space owners in De Waterkant (population) are taken into account by using semi-structured interviews. All narratives are analysed in Altas.ti – qualitative data analysis software – to identify applicable factors, which participants believe are contributing to the ‘‘de-gaying’’ of Cape Town’s gay village. Findings – From the conducted analyses, it becomes apparent that Western theorisation of the ‘‘degaying’’ of gay villages is not universally applicable as certain factors contributing to De Waterkant’s demise appear to be location-specific, suggesting that Western theory is insufficient to explain gay spatial realities in non-Western contexts such as South Africa. The identified factors responsible for the ‘‘de-gaying’’ of De Waterkant adversely affect Cape Town’s status as a gay capital and its ability to market this gay neighbourhood to attract the gay tourism market. This may result in lost socio-economic opportunities considering the financial contribution of gay travellers to the local tourist economy. Originality/value – This study is the first of its kind to use first-hand narratives of the six remaining gay business owners in De Waterkant and marks the first attempt to investigate the factors, from a nonWestern perspective, which led to the ‘‘de-gaying’’ of Africa’s only gay village. Taking into account the socio-economic value added by gay tourism, the findings provide the first non-Western perspective on the demise of Africa’s and South Africa’s only gay neighbourhood from a gay leisure space owner perspective, including the possible repercussions on Cape Town’s local tourist economy. Some tactical considerations and recommendations are suggested to ensure the continuation of gay tourism in the cityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Tourism Citiesen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectCape Townen_US
dc.subjectDe Waterkanten_US
dc.subjectde-gayingen_US
dc.subjectgay neighbourhooden_US
dc.subjectgay travelleren_US
dc.subjectgay leisure spaceen_US
dc.titleCape Town’s gay village: from “gaytrified” tourism Mecca to “heterosexualised” urban spaceen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-10-2019-0193-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cape_Town_gay_village.pdf1.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

179
Last Week
2
Last month
6
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Download(s)

277
checked on Aug 29, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.