Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/8069
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZuze, Herberten_US
dc.contributor.authorWeideman, Meliusen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T09:55:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T09:55:10Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationZuze, H. & Weideman, M. 2011. Cloaking on Google’s SERP – search engine spamdexing. 13th World Wide Web, 14-16 September, Johannesburg, South Africa. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304178909]en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/304178909-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/8069-
dc.descriptionPosteren_US
dc.description.abstractWhilst the Internet is growing exponentially and acting as the repository of an enormous amount of information, the content quality is also being compromised. Content relevancy is continually being decreased by an increasing number of unethical website designers who are implementing various black hat techniques to trick the search engine algorithm in order to obtain a higher ranking. Research was conducted with the aim to establish the how and when of search engine algorithms’ attempts to curb spamdexing. Nevertheless, cloaking, another form of spamdexing, was identified as existing on the search engine result page (SERP) of Google, regardless of the practice having been denounced by the search engine. Five similar websites with varying keyword densities were designed and submitted to Google, Yahoo! and Bing. After 16 days of the first experiment, three of these websites were cloaked by an Iranian site. The cloaking lasted for 10 days for the first, 11 days for the second and 39 days for the third website. A phase 2 experiment was conducted and the third website was not indexed by Google for both phases of the experiments. This was the case in spite of the fact that it had a high keyword density, as supported by scholars. Also, the Iranian webmasters might have opted to scrap the site. This could be done in expectation of a higher number of visitors to the site looking for laptops rather than the actual information that was included on their site. None of the websites submitted to Yahoo! and Bing were cloaked. This research provided evidence that the search engine algorithms are still failing to fully address these practices and some developers are implementing cloaking without being identified by the search engines. The research also established that the waiting time for indexing can be prolonged by such practises and this may result in some websites not being indexed at all.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCloakingen_US
dc.subjectgoogle’s SERPen_US
dc.subjectsearch engineen_US
dc.subjectspamdexingen_US
dc.titleCloaking on Google’s SERP – search engine spamdexingen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:FID - Conference Posters
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cloaking on Google’s SERP_ search engine spamdexing.pdf948.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

200
Last Week
1
Last month
3
checked on Sep 2, 2026

Download(s)

48
checked on Sep 2, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.