Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7777
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMnguni, Mkhululi Elvis Siyandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTzoneva, Raynitchkaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T09:39:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-23T09:39:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationMnguni, M.E.S. & Tzoneva, R. 2015. Comparison of the operational speed of hard-wired and IEC 61850 standard-based implementations of a reverse blocking protection scheme. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 10(3): 740-754. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2015.10.3.740]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1975-0102-
dc.identifier.issn2093-7423-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7777-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the reverse blocking busbar protection scheme with aim to improve the speed of its operation and at the same time to increase operational reliability, flexibility and stability of the protection during external and internal faults by implementation of the extended functionality provided by the IEC61850 standard-based protective Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs). The practical implementation of the scheme by the use of IEC 61850 standard communication protocol is investigated. The proposed scheme is designed for a radial type of a distribution network and is modeled and simulated in the DigSILENT software environment for various faults on the busbar and its outgoing feeders. A laboratory test bench is built using three ABB IEDs 670 series that are compliant with the IEC 61850 standard, CMC 356 Omicron test injection device, PC, MOXA switch, and a DC power supplier. Two types of the reverse blocking signals between the IEDs in the test bench are considered: hard wired and Ethernet communication by using IEC 61850 standard GOOSE messages. Comparative experimental study of the operational trip response speeds of the two implementations for various traffic conditions of the communication network shows that the performance of the protection scheme for the case of Ethernet IEC 61850 standard-based communication is better.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Korean Institute of Electrical Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Electrical Engineering & Technologyen_US
dc.subjectBusbaren_US
dc.subjectPower systemen_US
dc.subjectReverse busbar blocking schemeen_US
dc.subjectIEC61850 standarden_US
dc.subjectDistribution systemsen_US
dc.subjectProtection relaysen_US
dc.subjectIEDsen_US
dc.subjectGOOSE messageen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory test benchen_US
dc.titleComparison of the operational speed of hard-wired and IEC 61850 standard-based implementations of a reverse blocking protection schemeen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2015.10.3.740-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Eng - Journal articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of the Operational Speed of Hard-wired and IEC 61850.pdf3.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

172
Last Week
1
Last month
7
checked on Aug 14, 2026

Download(s)

194
checked on Aug 14, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.