Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7267
Title: Effect of the growth retardant Cycocel® in controlling the growth of Dombeya burgessiae
Authors: North, Jade J. 
Laubscher, Charles Petrus 
Ndakidemi, Patrick Alois 
Keywords: (2-Chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride;chlorosis;dry weight;plant height
Issue Date: 2010
Publisher: Academic Journals
Source: North, J. J., Laubscher, C. P & Ndakidemi, P. A. 2010. Effect of the growth retardant Cycocel® in controlling the growth of Dombeya burgessiae. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(29): 4529-4533. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1666]
Journal: African Journal of Biotechnology 
Abstract: Pink dombeya (Dombeya burgessiae) was tested for its potential as a flowering potted plant, using the growth retardant Cycocel® (2-chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride. The treatments included a control, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 mg/L of Cycocel® per pot and were applied when seedlings reached 7 - 8 cm in height. All treatments significantly reduced plant height. The plants treated with 0.5 mg/L were only marginally shorter than the control, while the height of plants treated with 1, 2 and 3 mg/L Cycocel®, were greatly reduced. Increased Cycocel® concentrations decreased plant width in all treatments, as compared with the control. At all applied concentrations, the deterioration of foliage greenness was observed. The highest concentration of Cycocel® (3 mg/L) resulted in cycocel-induced chlorosis. This was followed by the 2, 1 and 0.5 mg/L respectively, all showing symptoms of chlorosis; however to a lesser extent. Cycocel® treated plants exhibited greener foliage in the new leaves formed in the weeks after application compared with the control. It is important to mention that the new leaves formed in the weeks after application were not affected, and were in fact darker green with the higher concentrations of Cycocel® treatments.The fresh and dry weights of plants severely decreased with the increased Cycocel® concentrations. The highest concentration (0.3% a.i.) caused the largest reduction, with plants in this treatment only weighing 38% of the total fresh weight of the control and 35% of the total dry weight.
URI: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7267
ISSN: 1684–5315
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1666
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (not DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Effect of the growth retardant.pdf71.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

185
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on Dec 21, 2025

Download(s)

29
checked on Dec 21, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.