Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6868
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeane Tameshnieen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrijmohanlall Rashjreeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-05T10:36:01Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-05T10:36:01Z-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationDeane, Tameshnie, and Brijmohanlall, Rashjree. “The Constitutional Court’s Approach to Equality.” 44.2 (2003): 275–100.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0010-020X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/6868-
dc.descriptionArticleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe constitution takes a substantive rather than a formal approach to equality. At times it may be the very essence of equality to treat groups and individuals differently in order to accommodate their different needs and interests. The authors consider the meaning of s 9 of the 1996 Constitution in the context of South African constitutional equality jurisprudence. They highlight cases confirming that differentiation on grounds that affect a person's dignity as a human being is proscribed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUNISA Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCodicillusen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectconstitutionen_US
dc.subjectequalityen_US
dc.subjectgroupsen_US
dc.subjects 9 of the 1996 Constitutionen_US
dc.subjectequality jurisprudenceen_US
dc.subjectdignityen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africanen_US
dc.titleThe Constitutional Court's approach to equalityen_US
dc.type.patentArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (not DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tameshnie_Deane_Rashjree_Brijmohanlall_BUS_2003.pdfArticle118.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

108
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

109
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons