Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6574
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Philip JDen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnnegarn, Harold Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorPemberton-Pigott, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T10:57:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-13T10:57:12Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citation30 March-1 April 2015, pp13-17en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-9922041-8-1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/6574-
dc.descriptionConference Proceedingsen_US
dc.description.abstractWorldwide, millions of people with limited access to modem energy sources cook food using a wide variety of solid fuels, primarily biomass. Often the cooking arrangement is no more than three stones supporting a pot; sometimes there is an appliance which may be fashioned from local materials; sometimes there is a fabricated appliance. In most cases the combustion of the fuel exposes the cook and often the whole family to smoke and particulates. The World Health Organisation indicates that this exposure is one of the leading causes of Disability Adjusted Lost Years of life. Many organisations have taken credible steps to alleviate the problem, specifically by supplying improved stove technologies, improved or alternate fuels, or a combination thereof. One of the challenges, however, is that there is no agreement on what the performance criteria should be for a so-called "clean stove" or improved cooking technology. Some have focused on the efficiency of the cooking process, arguing that the use of less fuel for a given duty would inherently lower the risks, implicitly assuming that emissions are an inherent property of the fuel. Some have focused on minimizing the total energy used per task, not the total fuel, treating the leftover charcoal as 'unburned fuel,'similarly assuming that less energy means less emissions. Others have focused on ensuring the cleanest possible bum, often by careful preparation of the fuel, which often leads to the inefficient use of the available fuel resource and rejection by the users. Some have focused on the nature of the fuel, overlooking the fact that emissions arise from the choice of the fuel-stove combination. Moreover, users tend to use what is most readily and most cheaply to hand, and are not readily persuaded to use "better" alternative fuels. In this contribution we seek to explore the range of demands from users, in the hope of finding some common threads which would permit the rational development of standards for clean solid-fuelled cookstoves adaptable to the huge range of fuels and cooking cycles employed worldwide.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIEEE Xploreen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/-
dc.subjectClean cookstovesen_US
dc.subjectSolid fuelsen_US
dc.subjectDomestic energyen_US
dc.titleTowards a standard for clean solid-fuelled cookstovesen_US
dc.type.patentOtheren_US
dc.relation.conferenceProc. International Conf. Domestic Uses Energy, Cape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Eng - Conference Proceedings
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lloyd_P_Annegam_H_Pemperton-Pigott_C_Eng_2015.pdf530.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

138
Last Week
2
Last month
5
checked on Dec 28, 2025

Download(s)

37
checked on Dec 28, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons