Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5049
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZuze, Herbert-
dc.contributor.authorWeideman, Melius-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T09:29:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26T09:29:04Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.zaw3.co.za/index.php/ZA-WWW/2011/paper/viewFile/490/141-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/5049-
dc.description.abstractInternet usage is increasing dramatically daily, as is Web development which is enhanced by the emergence of new Web technologies. Social networks are continuously dominating our Web interactions through Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and MySpace, drawing a considerable number of Internet users. However, the dominance of the Web as the epicentre of both important and useless information has affected competition in industries like e-business. It takes some time for a website to be indexed and appear on the search engine result page. The indexing process involves the reading and recording of the weight-carrying words in a search format to an index file by a crawler. This results in the webpage being discovered by users on a search engine results page. A user can also submit a website manually for indexing. Crawlers should then visit this website, record all the words on the pages, and note links to other sites. The index file is updated regularly, either by human editors or by these crawlers. After an extensive literature survey, empirical evidence indicated that the indexing period for webpages is not fixed. In a recent two phase experiment, five websites were monitored to determine their indexing time for Google, Yahoo! and Bing. The experiment proved that there is a relationship between keyword density and indexing time. Yahoo! and Bing seem to favour sites with high keyword density when indexing. During the first experiment the shortest indexing waiting time was five days and the longest, 33 days. For the second one, the waiting time varied between 19 and 29 days. However, according to this study, a period of approximately 19 days is a reasonable average waiting time. It is possible that the Google sandbox effect plays a role in these experiments, and this was also investigated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCape Peninsula University of Technologyen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/en
dc.subjectInterneten_US
dc.subjectWebometricsen_US
dc.subjectIndexingen_US
dc.subjectSearch enginesen_US
dc.subjectOptimisationen_US
dc.subjectWebsite visibilityen_US
dc.subjectWebsite usabilityen_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of search engine indexing timeen_US
dc.type.patentOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:FID - Conference Proceedings
Prof. Melius Weideman
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zuze_H_Weideman_Melius_FID_2011.pdfMain article477.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

184
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Oct 12, 2026

Download(s)

72
checked on Oct 12, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons