Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/3413
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLabuschagne, A-
dc.contributor.authorvan Rensburg, N.F.J.-
dc.contributor.authorVan der Merwe, Alna-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-18T10:29:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-18T10:29:04Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationLabuschagne, A., van Rensburg, N. J., & Van der Merwe, A. J. (2009). Comparison of linear beam theories. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1), 20-30.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.006-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/3413-
dc.descriptionLabuschagne, A., van Rensburg, N. J., & Van der Merwe, A. J. (2009). Comparison of linear beam theories. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1), 20-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.006en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we consider three models for a cantilever beam based on three different linear theories: Euler–Bernoulli, Timoshenko and two-dimensional elasticity. Using the natural frequencies and modes as a yardstick, we conclude that the Timoshenko theory is close to the two-dimensional theory for modes of practical importance, but that the applicability of the Euler–Bernoulli theory is limited.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectVibrationen_US
dc.subjectBeamen_US
dc.subjectTimoshenkoen_US
dc.subjectEuler–Bernoullien_US
dc.titleComparison of linear beam theoriesen_US
dc.type.patentArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Eng - Journal articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Labuschagne_A_van_Rensburg_NFJ_van_der_Merwe_AJ_Eng_2008.pdfMain Article545.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

105
Last Week
0
Last month
4
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

113
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.