Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Quality lies in the eyes of the beholder: A mismatch between student evaluation and peer observation of teaching
Authors: Salochana Hassan
Wouter Wium
Keywords: student evaluation, peer observation of teaching, quality assurance, conceptions of teaching effectiveness, framing
Issue Date: 2014
Abstract: The study described in this article was prompted by the poor performance of students in an ‘at risk subject’ in a science faculty at a university in South Africa. Teacher performance could contribute to poor performance among students, therefore the performance of one of the science teachers whose students were performing poorly was evaluated by his students and through peer observation of his teaching. The article draws on a merger between Bernstein’s ideas on framing as well as deep and surface approaches to learning to form a theoretical framework that underpinned the study. Peer observation showed that the teacher employed predominantly teacher-centred, passive approaches to teaching, and the facilitation of active learning was minimal, that is, framing was strong. Students, however, evaluated their teacher positively, indicating that he was an ‘effective’ teacher. Therefore, the perception of what constitutes ‘quality teaching’ is viewed differently by peers and students. This is most likely due to the incompatibility between peers’ conception of teaching and students’ conception of learning. Therefore, students’ feedback on teaching is not necessarily accurate or useful.
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
18146627%2E2014%2E935000.pdf222.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Mar 27, 2023


checked on Mar 27, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.