Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/2526| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tummala, KK | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-03-27T12:19:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-27T12:19:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2070-0156 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11189/2526 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This reflective short piece attempts to untangle the semantic confusion between Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Affirmative Action (AA) and Diversity – all trying to better the lot of minorities in public service. It also tries to take a brief look at the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, and points out future directions. It draws upon the experience of three countries: India, the most populous democracy with the longest and exhaustive experience with AA (known there as ‘‘reservations’’); the United States, the longest working democracy, where AA is very controversial; and the Republic of South Africa, whose experience is relatively nascent (Tummala, 1999). | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | JUTA | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | JBMD; | |
| dc.title | Equal employment, affirmative action and diversity | en_US |
| dc.type.patent | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | BUS - Journal of Business and Management Dynamics (JBMD) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tummala_equal_jbmd_2008.pdf | Article | 122.67 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
107
Last Week
1
1
Last month
1
1
checked on Sep 4, 2026
Download(s)
53
checked on Sep 4, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.