Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/2526
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTummala, KK
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-27T12:19:54Z
dc.date.available2015-03-27T12:19:54Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn2070-0156-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/2526
dc.description.abstractThis reflective short piece attempts to untangle the semantic confusion between Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO), Affirmative Action (AA) and Diversity – all trying to better the lot of minorities in public service. It also tries to take a brief look at the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, and points out future directions. It draws upon the experience of three countries: India, the most populous democracy with the longest and exhaustive experience with AA (known there as ‘‘reservations’’); the United States, the longest working democracy, where AA is very controversial; and the Republic of South Africa, whose experience is relatively nascent (Tummala, 1999).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJUTAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJBMD;
dc.titleEqual employment, affirmative action and diversityen_US
dc.type.patentArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal of Business and Management Dynamics (JBMD)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
tummala_equal_jbmd_2008.pdfArticle122.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

107
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Download(s)

53
checked on Sep 4, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.