Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/11034
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMpateni, Siviween_US
dc.contributor.authorZwakala, Kuhleen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitcher, Richard Denysen_US
dc.contributor.authorDa Silva, Michelleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-13T10:56:25Z-
dc.date.available2026-11-13T10:56:25Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationMpateni, S.S. et al. 2025. #MissingInAction: a review of the social media footprint of South African interventional radiology practitioners. Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa, 3(1): 1-6. [https://doi.org/10.4102/jcmsa.v3i1.97]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2960-110X (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/11034-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly developing branch of medicine; however, the general awareness of the subspeciality among patients and medical colleagues is limited. Social media (SM) has become an integral part of information transfer globally, and its utility as an effective communication tool can be leveraged by IRs to bridge this knowledge gap. This study investigated the SM footprint of IR providers in South Africa. Methods: An online analysis of radiology practices (N = 100) registered on the Radiological Society of South Africa (RSSA) website was performed. The SM footprint of practices offering IR services was audited, and statistical analysis was performed to examine the level of SM uptake, the relationship between SM uptake in urban versus non-urban locations and between practice size. Results: There were 38 practices offering IR services with 68% (n = 26) located in major metropolitan areas. A systematic online Google search revealed that 84% (n = 32) had a website and the most widely used SM platform was Facebook. There was a statistically significant correlation between the size of the radiology practices and the total number of SM accounts (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Most South African IR practitioners have a SM presence with larger radiology practices establishing a broad digital presence on SM. Poor SM visibility, particularly from smaller practices, on these platforms may limit their ability to reach their target audience. Contribution: Improving the current usage of SM by IR practitioners may present an opportunity to display their services.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africaen_US
dc.subjectInterventional radiologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectMedical educationen_US
dc.subjectHealth promotionen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.title#MissingInAction: a review of the social media footprint of South African interventional radiology practitionersen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4102/jcmsa.v3i1.97-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Missing_In_Action.pdf310.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.