Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10874
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamasenya, Koenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOladipo, Babatundeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKatambwe, Vinny Ndjateen_US
dc.contributor.authorVadapalli, Viswanath Ravi Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Jochenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGcasamba, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHorvat, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Hsing-Jungen_US
dc.contributor.authorIizuka, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPetrik, Leslieen_US
dc.contributor.authorOjumu, Tundeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-30T13:23:29Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-30T13:23:29Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationRamasenya, K. et al. 2025. Comparative study of direct and indirect aqueous mineral carbonation of construction and demolition waste fines for CO2 sequestration. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13(5): 1-13. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.117754]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2213-3437-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10874-
dc.description.abstractSustainable development prioritizes waste utilization to mitigate environmental impacts through recycling and reuse. In construction and demolition waste (C&DW) recycling, the recovery of recycled concrete aggregate generates C&DW fines. These fines contain significant calcium (Ca), making them potential feedstock for CO2 sequestration through accelerated mineral carbonation processes. This approach offers a promising pathway for reducing CO2 emissions from the cement industry by utilizing alkaline waste to form thermodynamically stable carbonates. This study compares the effectiveness of direct and indirect aqueous mineral carbonation in sequestering CO2 using classified C&DW fines. Laboratory experiments assessed Ca extraction using borehole water (BHW) and acid mine drainage (AMD) as leaching agents, along with optimization of the solid-to-liquid (S/ L) ratio for carbonation. Analysis of raw C&DW fines, leached residue, leachate, and the resulting solid carbonation product was performed using XRD, XRF, TGA, BET/BJH, PSD, and ICP-OES techniques. A 1:10 S/L ratio was optimal for Ca extraction and subsequent carbonation. BHW leached ~328 mg-Ca/L-BHW, significantly higher than AMD (85 mg-Ca/L-AMD). High concentration of SO2−4 in AMD reacted with Ca to form gypsum, limiting Ca leaching into the solution. Thus, BHW was used in subsequent carbonation experiments. Direct aqueous carbonation achieved a total CO2 uptake of 52.8 g-CO2/kg-C&DW fines, whereas indirect aqueous carbonation captured 10.5 g-CO2/kg-C&DW fines. This research highlights the benefit of repurposing C&DW as low-cost material for direct CO2 capture. Moreover, the potential substitution of BHW with polluted waste streams like AMD underscores an integrated approach to waste valorization and CO2 mitigation, particularly in water-scarce regions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectMineral carbonationen_US
dc.subjectConstruction and demolition wasteen_US
dc.subjectCalcium extractionen_US
dc.subjectCO2 sequestrationen_US
dc.subjectDirect aqueous carbonationen_US
dc.subjectIndirect aqueous carbonationen_US
dc.titleComparative study of direct and indirect aqueous mineral carbonation of construction and demolition waste fines for CO2 sequestrationen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.117754-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Eng - Journal articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative_study_direct_indirect_aqueous_mineral.pdf4.88 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.