Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10551
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorButhelezi, Ayanda Siphumeleleen_US
dc.contributor.authorChetty, Manimagalayen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, Amir H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-24T13:10:55Z-
dc.date.available2026-06-24T13:10:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationButhelezi, A.S., Chetty, M. & Mohammadi, A.H. 2025. Techno‐economic assessment of biofuels production from sugarcane bagasse. Energy Science and Engineering, 13(9): 4270-4286. [https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70178]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2050-0505 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10551-
dc.description.abstractThe cooperative effect of climate change, rising fossil fuel prices and global fossil fuel depletion necessitates the production and use of renewable energy nationally and globally. The need for more energy-producing methods is growing as energy consumption rises. A techno-economic assessment (TEA) delivers an in-depth analysis of the financial feasibility of these processes, informing investment choices and policy development for biofuel advancement. Three biological biomass-to-fuel conversion routes were investigated in this study: fermentation for bioethanol production, anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas production and dark fermentation (DF) for biohydrogen production. Aspen Plus software simulations were performed to process 51840 kg/h sugarcane bagasse (SCB). The discounted cash flow method was used for economic assessment using the tax rate of 28% and the discount rate of 12%, with a straight-line depreciation of 20% for 5 years. The plant life was assumed to be 25 years. The most profitable method was DF with an net present value (NPV) of 67.41 million USD, a payback period (PBP) of 3.3 years, an ROI of 1.51 and a PI of 7.95. Biogas production ranked second with an NPV of 37.57 million USD, a PBP of 4.4 years, an ROI of 1.16 and a PI of 5.85. Under conditions assumed in the study, bioethanol production was not feasible at all with the negative NPV. The project will not be able to recover its initial investment at the end of the plant's life.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectBioethanolen_US
dc.subjectBiofuelen_US
dc.subjectBiogasen_US
dc.subjectBiohydrogenen_US
dc.subjectSugarcane bagasse (SCB)en_US
dc.subjecttechno‐economic assessment (TEA)en_US
dc.titleTechno‐economic assessment of biofuels production from sugarcane bagasseen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70178-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Eng - Journal articles (not DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Techno‐Economic_Assessment.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

45
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

19
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.