Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/10070
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShackleton, Claireen_US
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Robert W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWest, Sachaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBantjes, Jasonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwartz, Leslieen_US
dc.contributor.authorDerman, Wayneen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbertus, Yumnaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-17T10:21:48Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-17T10:21:48Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationShackleton, C. et. al. 2024. Robotic locomotor training in a low-resource setting: a randomized pilot and feasibility trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46(15): 3363-3372. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2245751]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288-
dc.identifier.issn1464-5165 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/10070-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Activity-based Training (ABT) represents the current standard of neurological rehabilitation. Robotic Locomotor Training (RLT), an innovative technique, aims to enhance rehabilitation outcomes. This study aimed to conduct a randomized pilot and feasibility trial of a locomotor training program within South Africa. Materials and methods: Individuals with chronic traumatic motor incomplete tetraplegia (n=16). Each intervention involved 60-minute sessions, 3x per week, for 24-weeks. Outcomes included feasibility measures and functional capacity. Results: 17 out of 110 individuals initiated the program (recruitment rate = 15.4%) and 16 completed the program (drop-out rate = 5.8%) and attended sessions (attendance rate = 93.9%). Both groups showed a significant increase in upper extremity motor score (MS) and abdominal strength post intervention. Only the RLT group showed a significant change in lower extremity MS, with a mean increase of 3.00 [0.00; 16.5] points over time. Distance walked in the Functional Ambulatory Inventory (SCI-FAI) increased significantly (p=0.02) over time only for the RLT group. Conclusions: Feasibility rates of the intervention and functional outcomes justify a subsequent powered RCT comparing RLT to ABT as an effective rehabilitation tool for potentially improving functional strength and walking capacity in people with incomplete SCI.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDisability and Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectSpinal cord injuriesen_US
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectRoboticsen_US
dc.subjectExoskeleton deviceen_US
dc.subjectExercise therapyen_US
dc.subjectGaiten_US
dc.subjectMuscle strengthen_US
dc.subjectSCI-FAIen_US
dc.titleRobotic locomotor training in a low-resource setting: a randomized pilot and feasibility trialen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2245751-
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Not Open Access.pdf22.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

168
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Download(s)

27
checked on Aug 13, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.