Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/7949
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatsha, Tandi Edithen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrink, Lucyen_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Rensburg, Susan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorErasmus, Rajiv Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T11:57:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-03T11:57:03Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationMatsha, T., Brink, L., Van Rensburg, S. J. et al. 2006. Soluble Transferrin receptors and Soluble Transferrin Receptor – Ferritin Index in a healthy African population of South Africa. Medical Technology SA, 20(2): 5-8. [https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC74183]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1011-5528-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC74183-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/7949-
dc.description.abstractBackground: South Africa has a high incidence of iron deficiency and HIV/Aids. The soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is not an acute phase reactant as is ferritin, hence it is useful for the diagnosis of iron deficiency in the presence of inflammation or infection. Methods: To explore the use of sTfR and sTfR log ferritin index in evaluating body iron status, we measured soluble transferrin receptors and indirect measures of iron stores in 371 healthy Africans. Results: We observed an inverse correlation between sTfR and log serum ferritin (r - 0.17, P < 0.0001), as well as sTfR log ferritin index and transferrin saturation (r - 0.26, P < 0.0001). Subjects classified as having iron deficiency (serum ferritin < 30µg/L and transferrin saturation < 15%) had significantly higher sTfR concentrations when compared to subjects with normal serum ferritin and transferrin saturation 15 50%, (9.2 ± 6.9µg/ml and 5.0 ± 2.4µg/ml, P < 0.0001) respectively. The concentrations of sTfR were normal to increased (5.5 ± 3.2 µg/ml) in subjects who may be classified as iron deficient based on serum ferritin levels (serum ferritin levels less than 30 µg/L, but transferrin saturation 15 50%). However, the sTfR log ferritin index was superior over sTfR values in differentiating between this group and subjects classified as normal, respectively, 4.6 ± 4.1 and 2.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.0001. No significant differences were observed between the iron overload group (serum ferritin raised) and normal subjects. Conclusion: Based on these results we suggest that sTfR log ferritin index be used together with other parameters of iron stores in the diagnosis of iron deficiency, particularly when sTfR concentration results are equivocalen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Society of Medical Laboratory Technologists of South Africa (SMLTSA)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedical Technology SAen_US
dc.subjectTransferrin receptoren_US
dc.subjectSoluble Transferrin receptoren_US
dc.subjectIron deficiency anaemiaen_US
dc.subjectAnaemia of chronic diseasesen_US
dc.subjectSerum ferritinen_US
dc.titleSoluble Transferrin receptors and Soluble Transferrin Receptor – Ferritin Index in a healthy African population of South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:HWSci - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Soluble Transferrin receptors and Soluble Transferrin Receptor.pdfArticle113.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Digital Knowledge are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.