Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6346
Title: Perceived exertion and metabolic cost during progressive and randomized walking protocols
Authors: Davies, Simeon EH 
Keywords: Walking;Ratings of perceived exertion;Metabolic;Progressive and random
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Ergonomics Society of South Africa
Source: Davies, S.E.H. 2015. Perceived exertion and metabolic cost during progressive and randomized walking protocols. Ergonomics SA. 27 (1) 1-12
Journal: Ergonomics SA 
Abstract: The objective of the study was to ascertain whether selected physiological responses and the perception of effort varied during four different walk protocols where speed increased progressively 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 km.hr-1 (progressive treadmill walk (PTW); and progressive land walk (PLW); or where the participant adjusted to random changes of speed e.g. 6, 4, 7, 3, and 5 km.hr-1 during a randomized treadmill walk (RTW); and a randomized land walk (RLW). Mean stature and mass of the seven participants was 1.75m and 70kg respectively, with a mean body fat of 15%. Metabolic measures included heart rate, relative oxygen uptake, ventilation, respiration frequency, which increased in a linear fashion up to 6 km.hr-1, however at 7 km.hr-1 there was a significant increase in metabolic response notably during the PLW, and to a similar, although lesser extent in RLW, probably as a consequence of the loss of kinetic energy when turning at each cone in order to maintain the speed during each shuttle. Respiration frequency appeared to be a more sensitive indicator of physical exertion, exhibiting a rapid elevation at 6 km.hr-1. The perception of effort during each mode and at each speed was largely congruent during each walk protocol.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6346
ISSN: 1010-2728
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/esa.v27i1.2
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Perceived exertion and metabolic cost during progressive.pdfMain article159.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Aug 21, 2018

Download(s)

1
checked on Aug 21, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons