Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6098
Title: Exploring variability among quality management system auditors when rating the severity of audit findings at a nuclear power plant
Authors: Simons, RC 
Bester, Andre 
Moll, M 
Keywords: Quality Assurance (QA);Nuclear power plant;System auditors
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: South African Journal of Industrial Engineering
Abstract: A reliable quality assurance (QA) function in the nuclear environment is underpinned by the effective identification of risk, and by effective decision-making processes in relation to the risk identified. The need for competent auditors who are able to remain objective and independent at all times forms a critical component of this process. This exploratory study sought to determine reasons for the noted inconsistency among auditors when rating the severity of audit findings, and to provide recommendations to reduce this variability. The Delphi technique, a structured process to gather information from a panel of experts, was adopted to enable multiple iterations of qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis, in an attempt to mimic the elements of a sequential exploratory strategy related to a mixed method methodology.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7166/28-1-1512
http://hdl.handle.net/11189/6098
ISSN: 1012-277X
Appears in Collections:Appsc - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Simons_RC_Bester_A_Moll_M_AppSci_2017.pdfMain article911.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

47
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 15, 2018

Download(s)

20
checked on Oct 15, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons