Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5867
Title: Democracy and majority rule in South Africa: Implications for good governance
Authors: Umezurike, Samuel Augustine 
Iwu, Chux Gervase 
Keywords: Accountability;Democracy;Leadership;Governance;Public protector
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Acta Universitatis Danubius
Abstract: South Africa is a leading example of democracy in Africa albeit many argue that it has lost meaningful direction in aspects which range from its practice of majority rule, social cohesion, and neoliberalization of its political economy and international diplomacy. South Africa could fairly well be viewed as an emerging middle power but many of its actions have belied this thus allowing certain analysts to consider it as inconsistent, confusing, and even sinister. Some of the core problematic areas of South African democracy include poverty, unemployment, inequality, high level of HIV/AIDS, corruption, fast decaying educational system, electricity (load) shedding, fast loss of rand value in the international market and rampant strike actions, especially in the mining industry. However, this paper depends on the documentary method of research to examine the drama surrounding the security upgrade of the President’s home at Nkandla. The findings show that in a democratic society like South Africa, majority rule may sometimes be a limitation of democratic practices. In order to avert the challenges which majority rule may pose to the other principles of democracy, the principles of values, such as separation of power among the three levels of government and rule of law, must be respected.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5867
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Umezurike_Samuel_Iwu_Chux Gervase_democracy and majority_.pdfMain article388.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

43
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Feb 9, 2021

Download(s)

28
checked on Feb 9, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons