Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5254
Title: Learning to teach argumentation: Facilitated reflection on a pre-service curriculum in South Africa
Authors: Braund, Martin 
Hewson, Peter W 
Scholtz, Zena 
Sadeck, Melanie 
Koopman, Robert 
Keywords: Argumentation;critical thinking;initial teacher education;science education
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Source: Martin Braund , Peter W. Hewson , Zena Scholtz , Melanie Sadeck & Robert Koopman (2011) Learning to teach argumentation: Facilitated reflection on a pre-service curriculum in South Africa, Education as Change, 15:sup1, S79-S93, DOI: 10.1080/16823206.2011.643630
Abstract: In South Africa, critical thinking is a prominent aim of education. Argumentation (the processes and products of arguing) is central to critical thinking and important in science and technology, but teachers have not been trained in classroom methods. This article reports an evaluation of the university-based part of a programme to train science and technology student teachers to teach argumentation. Observations of the university sessions produced detailed descriptions of the enacted curriculum with respect to argumentation and the teaching of argumentation. A model called SIMPL facilitated critical reflection by the programme’s teacher educators. These reflections validated course structures, identified key assumptions made by teacher educators and clarified the interplay between student teachers as learners, and teachers’ and teacher educators’ instructional roles. The findings showed that while the curriculum provided student teachers with ample experience of argumentation and opportunities to plan for and teach peers, they needed more support in facilitating argumentation discussions and drawing on sufficient, relevant science in peer teaching. SIMPL allowed teacher educators to realise they had not identified or differentiated student teachers’ learning of argumentation from learning to teach argumentation. Implications for future cohorts and the application of SIMPL to better understand the integration of aspects of training are discussed
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/5254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.643630
ISSN: 1682-3206
1947-9417 (e-)
Appears in Collections:Edu - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Learning to teach argumentation_Braund_Martin_Hewson_Peter W_Scholtz_Zena_Sadeck_Melanie_Koopman_Robert_pdfMain article356 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Feb 9, 2021

Download(s)

73
checked on Feb 9, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons