Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11189/4806
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSlabbert, AD-
dc.contributor.authorUkpere, Wilfred I-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-04T07:57:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-04T07:57:33Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAndre Slabbert, Wilfred I. Ukpere, (2011) "A comparative analysis of the Chinese and South African work ethic", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 38 Iss: 8, pp.734 - 741en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068291111143929-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11189/4806-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – South Africa is a developing country, and within this context, it is essential to be economically competitive and proactive. Various sources reveal that the national productivity has been traditionally low, and continues to remain low. Within the context of the international arena, this is unacceptable. If South Africa is to become a recognised role player in the international arena, it is imperative to increase productivity like China. This paper aims to focus on the issues involved. Design/methodology/approach – A 65‐item inventory which measures seven conceptually and empirically distinct facets of the work ethic construct, i.e. the multi‐dimensional work ethic profile (MWEP) was utilised to critically distinguish between the Chinese and South African workforces. The samples approximated 150 subjects in each grouping. Findings which emanate from this study have distinct ramifications for the South African economy. Findings – It appears as if a linkage exists between productivity and work ethic, as illustrated by amongst others, Hamilton‐Attwell and Du Gay and Pryke. Paradoxically, a number of other variables exist which impact on the productivity phenomenon, thus rendering a strict causal relationship between work ethic and productivity tenuous in nature. Despite this, it is a recognised reality that there is a substantive “negativity” in the work ethic of the South African labour force, possibly in relation to historical and cultural factors. The Chinese work ethic is diametrically opposed to that of South Africa. Research limitations/implications – In discussions with Chinese workers held in 2010, four primary schools of thought emerged: a firm belief that hard work will bring desired results; pride in personal accomplishments and hard work; fear of embarrassment or shame in case of failure; and immense patriotic pride in China and its achievements.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/za/en
dc.subjectChinese peopleen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectWork ethicen_US
dc.subjectLabour forceen_US
dc.subjectProductivity rateen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.titleA comparative analysis of the Chinese and South African work ethicen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:BUS - Journal Articles (DHET subsidised)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Slabbert_Andre_Ukpere_Wilfred_I_Bus_2011.pdfMain Article174.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

15
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Feb 18, 2019

Download(s)

9
checked on Feb 18, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons